The Use of Twitter to #DefendDACA & DREAMers
Abstract views: 880 / PDF downloads: 366
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/968Keywords:
Digital activism, DACA, DREAMers, Twitter, social media, digital mediaAbstract
The future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, as well as the welfare of its recipients, in the United State has become a constant feature in the news since President Trump announced his intentions to end the program in September 2017. In response, a social movement of significance was engineered utilizing social media as one of its core pillars to support the program. This study analyzes the content of tweets with the #DefendDACA hashtag, tweeted within 30 days of Trump’s initial announcement, in order to understand the intersection of digital activism and DACA, including functions, purpose, and tone. Results from the analysis found tweets primarily centered on call-to-action, asking participants to defend DACA. Tweets also disseminated vital information, particularly with a positive tone. These findings aid in explaining the movement’s strength.
Downloads
References
Abrego, L. J. (2018). Renewed Optimism and Spatial Mobility: Legal Consciousness of Latino Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Recipients and Their Families in Los Angeles. Ethnicities, 18(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817752563
Agarwal, S. D., Barthel, M. L., Rost, C., Borning, A., Bennett, W. L., & Johnson, C. N. (2014). Grassroots Organizing in The Digital Age: Considering Values and Technology in Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street. Information, Communication & Society, 17(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.873068
Amin, R. (2010). Social media uprisings and the future of cyber activism. Kennedy School Review, 10(1), 64-66.
Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good News for The Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210381738
Bekkers, V., Moody, R., & Edwards, A. (2011). Micro-Mobilization, Social Media and Coping Strategies: Some Dutch Experiences. Policy & Internet, 3(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1061
Bennett, W. L. (2008). Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. MIT Press.
Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. Cambridge University Press.
Boichak, O., Hemsley, J., Jackson, S., Tromble, R., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2021). Not the Bots You Are Looking For: Patterns and Effects of Orchestrated Interventions in The U.S. and German Elections. International Journal of Communication, 15(0), 26-37.
Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital Protest, Hashtag Ethnography, and the Racial Politics of Social Media in The United States: #Ferguson. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Current Research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young People, Digital Media, and Engagement: A Meta-Analysis of Research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190
Boynton, G. R., Cook, J., Daniels, K., Dawkins, M., Kopish, J., Makar, M., McDavid, W., Murphy, M., Osmundson, J., Steenblock, T., Sudarmawan, A., Wiese, P., & Zora, A. (2014). The Political Domain Goes to Twitter: Hashtags, Retweets and Urls. Open Journal of Political Science, 04(01), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2014.41002
Cabrera, N. L., Matias, C. E., & Montoya, R. (2017). Activism or Slacktivism? The Potential and Pitfalls of Social Media in Contemporary Student Activism. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(4), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000061
Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018, March 17). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
Calvo, E. (2015). Anatomía política de Twitter en Argentina: Tuiteando #Nisman. Capital Intelectual.
Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2015). ‘War Against Our Children’: Stance and Evaluation in # Bringbackourgirls Campaign Discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564735
Cisneros, J., & Bracho, C. (2019). Coming Out of the Shadows and The Closet: Visibility Schemas Among Undocuqueer Immigrants. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(6), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1423221
Conley, J. (2017, August 15). #DefendDACA: Nationwide rallies demand protection for young immigrants: Common dreams news. Common Dreams. https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/08/15/defenddaca-nationwide-rallies-demand-protection-young-immigrants
Copeland, L., & Römmele, A. (2014). Beyond The Base? Political Parties, Citizen Activists, and Digital Media Use in the 2009 German Federal Election Campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.902783
Croeser, S., & Highfield, T. (2014). Occupy Oakland and #oo: Uses of Twitter Within the Occupy Movement. First Monday, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i3.4827
Dalton, R., Van Sickle, A., & Weldon, S. (2010). The Individual–Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340999038X
Dean, J. (2005). Communicative Capitalism: Circulation and the Foreclosure of Politics. Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 1(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.2752/174321905778054845
Dubois, E., & Ford, H. (2015). Qualitative Political Communication: Trace Interviews: An Actor-Centered Approach. International Journal of Communication, 9(0), 25.
Flores-Yeffal, N. Y., Vidales, G., & Plemons, A. (2011). The Latino Cyber-Moral Panic Process in the United States. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 568–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.562222
Gibson, R. K. (2015). Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated’ Campaigning. Party Politics, 21(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472575
Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384984
Gladwell, M. (2010, Otober). Small change: Why the revolution will not be bweeted. The New Yorker, 5.
Golash-Boza, T., & Valdez, Z. (2018). Nested Contexts of Reception: Undocumented Students at the University of California, Central. Sociological Perspectives, 61(4), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417743728
Gonzales, R. G., Terriquez, V., & Ruszczyk, S. P. (2014). Becoming DACAmented: Assessing the Short-Term Benefits of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). American Behavioral Scientist, 58(14), 1852–1872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550288
Gruzd, A., & Roy, J. (2014). Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI354
Harlow, S., & Benbrook, A. (2019). How #Blacklivesmatter: Exploring the Role of Hip-Hop Celebrities in Constructing Racial Identity on Black Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1386705
Harlow, S., & Guo, L. (2014). Will the Revolution Be Tweeted or Facebooked? Using Digital Communication Tools in Immigrant Activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12062
Hooker, S., McHugh, M., & Mathay, A. (2015). Lessons from the local level: DACA’s implementation and impact on education and training success. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/lessons-local-level-dacas-implementation-and-impact-education-and-training-success
Hopke, J. E. (2012, September). New Media and the Formation of Alternative Publics: A Cross-Case Comparison of the #15M and #Occupy Movements. World Association for Public Opinion Researchers-Latin America (WAPOR-Latin America). World Association for Public Opinion Researchers-Latin America (WAPOR-Latin America), Bogota, Colombia.
Howard, P., Duffy, A., Freelon, D., Hussain, M., Mari, W., & Maziad, M. (2012). Opening closed regimes. In E. Anduiza, M. Jensen, & L. Jorba (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide (pp. 200–220). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108881.011
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The Role of Digital Media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0041
Johnson, S. (2017). What is the #DefendDACA day of action all about? Political eye candy. Political Eyecandy. https://btfblog.revivedesignstudios.com/blog/in-the-news/what-is-the-defenddaca-day-of-action-all-about/
Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the Collective: Social Media, the Occupy Movement And Its Constitution As a Collective Actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
Kevane, B., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2016). “Education Is Everything. It Determines Your Future”: Latino Youth and College Access in Montana. Latino Studies, 14(2), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2016.9
Kushwah, V. R. S., & Verma, K. (2021). Security and privacy challenges for big data on social media. In S. Sharma, V. Rahaman, & G. R. Sinha (Eds.), Big data analytics in cognitive social media and literary texts: Theory and praxis (pp. 267–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4729-1_15
Li, H., Dombrowski, L., & Brady, E. (2018). Working toward empowering a community: How immigrant-focused nonprofit organizations use Twitter during political conflicts. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148336
Lombard, M., Snyder‐Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Maher, T. V., & Earl, J. (2019). Barrier or Booster? Digital Media, Social Networks, and Youth Micromobilization. Sociological Perspectives, 62(6), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419867697
Martinez, L. M., & Salazar, M. del C. (2018). The Bright Lights: The Development of Oppositional Consciousness Among Dacamented Latino Youth. Ethnicities, 18(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817752495
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663765
Mayorkas, A. (2012). Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals: Who can be considered? The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/08/15/deferred-action-childhoodarrivals-who-can-be-considered
McGill, A. (2016, June 2). Have Twitter bots infiltrated the 2016 election? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/have-twitter-bots-infiltrated-the-2016-election/484964/
Morozov, E. (2009, April 28). Swine flu: Twitter’s power to misinform. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103562240
Neuman, W. R., Bimber, B., & Hindman, M. (2011). The internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 22–42). Oxford University Press.
Nicholls, W. J. (2013). The DREAMers: How the undocumented youth movement transformed the immigrant rights debate. Stanford University Press.
Nonnecke, B., Perez de Acha, G., Choi, A., Crittenden, C., Gutiérrez Cortés, F. I., Del Campo, A. M., & Miranda-Villanueva, O. M. (2021). Harass, mislead, & polarize: An analysis of Twitter political bots’ tactics in targeting the immigration debate before the 2018 U.S. midterm election. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epub/10.1080/19331681.2021.2004287?needAccess=true
O’Connor, S. (2017, September 5). Protest against Trump’s DACA decision at Placita Olvera in downtown LA. Los Angeles Daily News. https://www.dailynews.com/2017/09/05/protest-against-trumps-daca-decision-at-placita-olvera-in-downtown-la/
Owen, D. (2006). The Internet and youth civic engagement in the United States. In The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters and Activists (pp. 17–33). Routledge.
Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
Raynauld, V. (2014). The perfect political storm? The Tea Party Movement, the redefinition of the digital political mediascape, and the birth of online politicking 3.0. [Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University]. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2014-10058
Raynauld, V., & Greenberg, J. (2014). Tweet, Click, Vote: Twitter and the 2010 Ottawa Municipal Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.935840
Raynauld, V., Lalancette, M., & Tourigny-Koné, S. (2016). Political Protest 2.0: Social Media and the 2012 student strike in the province of Quebec, Canada. French Politics, 14(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2015.22
Raynauld, V., Richez, E., & Boudreau Morris, K. (2018). Canada is #IdleNoMore: Exploring Dynamics of Indigenous Political and Civic Protest in the Twitterverse. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301522
Raynes-Goldie, K., & Walke, L. (2008). Our space: Online civic engagement tools for youth. In Civic Life Online: Learning how Digital Media Can Engage Youth (pp. 161–188). MIT Press.
Scherman, A., Arriagada, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). ¿Hacia una nueva ciudadanía multifuncional? Uso de medios digitales, redes sociales online y participación política [Toward a New Multifunctional Citizenship? Use of Digital Media, Online Social Networks and Political Participation]. Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública, 2(0), 159. https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.22276
Sessions, J. (2017). Attorney General sessions delivers remarks on DACA. The United States Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-sessions-delivers-remarks-daca
Shen, F., Xia, C., & Skoric, M. (2020). Examining the Roles of Social Media and Alternative Media in Social Movement Participation: A Study of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101303
Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin.
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016). Social Media and Citizen Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Review. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1817–1839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616221
Stekelenburg, J. van, Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes. University of Minnesota Press.
Stone, C. (2017). Ending DACA program for young undocumented immigrants makes no economic Sense. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/83620/DACAUndocumentedImmigrants.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Svajlenka, N. P., Jawetz, T., & Bautista-Chavez, A. (2017, July 21). A new threat to DACA could cost states billions of dollars. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2017/07/21/436419/new-threat-daca-cost-states-billions-dollars/
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J., & García-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to Mobilize Protest Action: Online Mobilization Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi Movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
Tromble, R. (2021). Where Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 2056305121988929. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988929
Turcotte, A., & Raynauld, V. (2014). Boutique populism: The emergence of the tea party movement in the age of digital politics. In Political Marketing in the United States (pp. 61–84). Routledge.
Tweet Archivist. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. Tweet Archivist. http://www.tweetarchivist.com/about/faq
Tye, M., Leong, C., Tan, F., Tan, B., & Khoo, Y. H. (2018). Social Media for Empowerment in Social Movements: The Case of Malaysia’s Grassroots Activism. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 42, 408–430. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04215
Unzueta Carrasco, T. A., & Seif, H. (2014). Disrupting the Dream: Undocumented Youth Reframe Citizenship and Deportability Through Anti-Deportation Activism. Latino Studies, 12(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2014.21
Uwemedimo, O. T., Monterrey, A. C., & Linton, J. M. (2017). A Dream Deferred: Ending DACA Threatens Children, Families, and Communities. Pediatrics, 140(6), e20173089. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3089
Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expression, and Activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375
Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
Valenzuela, S., Correa, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Ties, Likes, and Tweets: Using Strong and Weak Ties to Explain Differences in Protest Participation Across Facebook and Twitter Use. Political Communication, 35(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334726
Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2012). Social Networks that Matter: Exploring the Role of Political Discussion for Online Political Participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr037
Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003628307
Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2013). How do I change politics? Evaluating the effectiveness of political participation modes. Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Victoria, Canada.
Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x
White, M. (2010, August 12). Clicktivism is ruining leftist activism | Protest | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/aug/12/clicktivism-ruining-leftist-activism
Wong, T. K., García, A. S., Abrajano, M., FitzGerald, D., Ramakrishnan, K., & Le, S. (2013). A Nationwide Analysis of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. 51.
Wong, T. K., & Valdivia, C. (2014). In Their Own Words: A Nationwide Survey of Undocumented Millennials. 25.
Young, A., Selander, L., & Vaast, E. (2019). Digital Organizing for Social Impact: Current Insights and Future Research Avenues on Collective Action, Social Movements, and Digital Technologies. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100257
Zimmerman, A. (2016). Transmedia Testimonio: Examining Undocumented Youth’s Political Activism in the Digital Age. 22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to JECS, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JECS upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide publication rights and the right for JECS to grant permissions as JECS editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and its metadata in professional indexing and reference services. Any revenues from such redistribution are used solely to support the continued publication and distribution of articles.
Accepted 2022-02-04
Published 2022-04-06