Public Spaces and Conflict Transformation: From Mostar’s Old Bridge to Its United World College
Abstract views: 716 / PDF downloads: 284
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/768Keywords:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, conflict transformation, extrastatecraft, heterarchy, post-war reconstruction.Abstract
The purpose of this analysis is to offer a complementary approach to top-down ethnic conflict resolution which depends upon international organizations, peace treaties, laws, and political elites. While legal and institutional approaches can possess merit, they neglect the necessity of engaging people and rebuilding community. Further, citizens can perceive a top-down approach as coercive. This paper focuses upon an alternative approach of transformation through the construction of post-war public spaces which create places for interaction and sociability, and thereby possess healing power. We adopt the philosophy of architect Lebbeus Woods, who offered specific principles for the post-war reconstruction of Sarajevo. These guidelines included an acknowledgement of the damage and destruction, but also the necessity of community participation in rebuilding. We also accept the contentions of Keller Easterling who identified the potential coerciveness of ‘extrastatecraft’, that is structures imposed upon a community from above by the state, or from outside by international organizations. The specific focus of this research is upon Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the work of international organizations and national political leaders ended the military conflict in 1995, but still fails to reconcile the three ethnic groups to a shared future. The method is rooted in comparative political anthropology, which entails an evaluation of processes, agency, and structures, as well as an account for the emotional aspects of identity and politics. Interviews regarding conflict and reconstruction, and ethnographic observations of public spaces are employed. The work concludes that the contributions of the United World College – Mostar contrasts to the relative failure of the reconstruction of the Old Mostar Bridge partially are due to the emphasis of the former on community engagement and inclusion. The results admit the difficulty of post-conflict transformation in ethnically divided systems, but contend that both the process and outcome of community engagement in the reconstruction of public spaces facilitates reconciliation and democratization.
Downloads
References
Alić, A., Cerić, H., & Habibović, S. (2018). The rulers of “No Man’s Land” – Study of cultural contact and social impact of the United World College in Mostar. Dobra Kniga.
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso books. (Original work published 1983)
Andjelic, N. (2003). Bosnia-Herzegovina: The end of a legacy. Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203495063
Aquilué, I, & Roca, E. (2016). Urban development after the Bosnian War: The division of Sarajevo's territory and the construction of East Sarajevo. Cities, 58(2016), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.008
Association for Societies in Transition. (2021). Skatepark Sarajevo 2025. https://asst-institute.net/skate-park-sarajevo-2025/
Basic, G., Delić, Z., & Sofradzija, H. (2019). Ideology of neo-fascism, education, and culture of peace: the empirical case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Critical Education, 10(6), 1-20.
Belloni, R. & Deane, S. (2005). From Belfast to Bosnia: Piecemeal peacemaking and the role of institutional learning. Civil Wars, 7(3), 219-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698280500423874
Belyaeva N. (2017). Citizen plenums in Bosnia protests: Creating a post-ethnic identity. In E. Arbatli and D. Rosenberg (Eds.), Non-Western social movements and participatory democracy: Protest in the age of transnationalism (pp. 115-138). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51454-3_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51454-3_8
Betonlandschaften. (2021). Skatepark, Kigali, Rwanda. https://www.betonlandschaften.de/en/portfolios/skatepark-kigali-ruanda-afrika/
Blokker P. (2005). Post-communist modernization, transition studies, and diversity in Europe. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(4), 503-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431005059703
Brumann, C. (2018). Anthropological utopia, closet eurocentrism, and culture chaos in the UNESCO World Heritage Arena. Anthropological Quarterly, 91(4), 1203-1233. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/717026/pdf?casa_token=HlYbYI_W7_UAAAAA:pfNZomZWjLVqW93lKkiK48XGgfSmKj8ty4E0vafb7c4jjXvJJOhTC2K9KUyvtSHg2v6lWj2JCw DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2018.0063
Carabelli, G. (2018). The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7778-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7778-4
Crocker, C. (2007). The place of grand strategy, statecraft, and power in conflict management. In P. Aall, F. Hampson, & C. Crocker (Eds.), Leashing the dogs of war (pp. 355-368). US Institute of Peace.
Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The power of infrastructure space. Verso Books.
Easterling, K. (2021). Medium design: Knowing how to work on the world. Verso Books.
Emkic E. (2018). Reconciliation and education in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From segregation to sustainable peace. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73034-9_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73034-9_3
Forde, S. (2016). The bridge on the Neretva: Stari Most as a stage of memory in post-conflict Mostar, Bosnia–Herzegovina. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(4), 467-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716652430
Gans-Morse, J. (2004). Searching for transitologists: Contemporary theories of post-communist transitions and the myth of a dominant paradigm. Post-Soviet Affairs, 20(4), 320–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.20.4.320
Greiff, T., & Greiff, J. (2014). The “Need for success”: Untying international peace interventions in Mostar. Alternatives, 39(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375414566153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375414566153
Halilovic-Pastuovic, M. (2020). Bosnian post-refugee transnationalism: After the Dayton Peace Agreement. Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-030-39564-3_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39564-3
Hill, M. (2018). Assembling the historic city: Actor networks, heritage mediation, and the return of the colonial past in post-Soviet Cuba. Anthropological Quarterly, 91(4), 1235+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A573714356/PPCM?u=wint47629&sid=bookmark-PPCM&xid=be2bdf79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2018.0064
Horvath, A. (2021). Political alchemy: Technology unbounded. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019183
Horvath, A. & Szakolczai, A. (2018). Political anthropology. In S. Turner & W. Outhwaite (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Political Sociology (pp. 189-204). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416513.n12
Kapidžić, D. (2020). Subnational competitive authoritarianism and power-sharing in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1700880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1700880
Kappler, S. (2017). Sarajevo’s ambivalent memoryscape: Spatial stories of peace and conflict. Memory Studies, 10(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016650484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016650484
Kurtović, L. (2018). Conjuring “the people”. Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2018(80), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2018.800104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2018.800104
Lai, D. (2020). Socioeconomic justice: International intervention and transition in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1912927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108871075
Lippman, P. (2019). Surviving the peace: The struggle for postwar recovery in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Vanderbilt University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16758w9
Maksić, A. (2017). Ethnic mobilization, violence, and the politics of affect: The Serb Democratic Party and the Bosnian War. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48293-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48293-4
Mihaylov, G. (2020). Ethnoterritorial divisions and urban geopolitics in Post-Yugoslav Mostar. In V. Mihaylov (Ed.), Spatial conflicts and divisions in post-socialist cities. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61765-3_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61765-3
Milan C. (2017). Reshaping citizenship through collective action: Performative and prefigurative practices in the 2013–2014 cycle of contention in Bosnia & Hercegovina. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(9), 1346-1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1388358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1388358
Milan, C. (2019). Social mobilization beyond ethnicity: Civic activism and grassroots movements in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351174244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351174244
Mohamedou, M. & Sisk, T. (2017). Democratisation in the 21st century: Reviving Transitology. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561677
Morrison, K. (2016). Sarajevo's Holiday Inn on the frontline of politics and war. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57718-4
Mujanović, J. (2018). Hunger and Fury: The Crisis of democracy in the Balkans. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905818764698
Mujkić, A. & Hulsey, J. (2010). Explaining the success of nationalist parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Politicka Misso, 47(2), 143-156.
Norris, P. (2008). Driving democracy: Do power-sharing institutions work? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790614
Omaljev, A. (2016). Discourses on identity in 'First' and 'Other' Serbia: Social construction of the Self and the Other in a divided Serbia. Ibidem Press.
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2018). Two schools under one roof: The most visible example of discrimination in education in Bosnia and Herzegovina. November. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/3/8/404990.pdf
Osler A., & Pandur, I. (2019). The right to intercultural education: students’ perspectives on schooling and opportunities for reconciliation through multicultural engagement in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Intercultural Education, 30(6), 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1626576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1626576
Piacentini, A. (2018). The Weight of ethnic collectivism: Youth, identifications, and boundaries in post-conflict Bosnia Herzegovina. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 18(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12282
Pobric, A. & Robinson, G. (2019). Recent urban development and gentrification in post-Dayton Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cities, 89(2019), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.001
Sarajlić, E. (2010). Bosnian elections and recurring ethnonationalisms: The ghost of the nation state. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 9(2), 66-88.
Silverman, H. (2020). The Inca in the Plaza: debating change in the World Heritage historic urban centre of Cusco, Peru. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(11), 1092-1108.https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1746921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1746921
Slessor, C. (2019, July 21). How to spot an architectural carbuncle. The Guardian: US Edition. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/jul/21/how-to-spot-an-architectural-carbuncle
Swimelar, S. (2020). LGBT rights in Bosnia: The challenge of nationalism in the context of Europeanization. Nationalities Papers, 48(4), 768-790. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.65
Szakolczai, A. (2009). Reflexive historical sociology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203193617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203193617
Szakolczai, Á. (2017). Permanent (trickster) liminality: The reasons of the heart and of the mind. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317694095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317694095
Telesković, D. (2020, January 23). The great interview with Milan Kucan: Thirty years after the 14th Congress. Nedeljnik. https://www.nedeljnik.rs/mi-smo-znali-da-skj-ne-shvatamo-kao-svoju-ako-ne-prihvate-nase-predloge-hrvati-nisu-imali-tu-pripremu-velika-ispovest-milana-kucana-30-godina-posle-cetrnaestog-kongresa/
Tellidis, I., & Glomm, A. (2019). Street art as everyday counterterrorism? The Norwegian art community’s reaction to the 22 July 2011 attacks. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(2), 191-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836718807502
Tešan, J. (2017). Defending the nation from her nationalism(s). Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 23(1), 81-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2017.1273681
Tešan, J. & Davison, J. (2020). Leadership amidst transition and liminality: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslavia. Advances in Politics and Economics 3(2), 16-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v3n2p16
Thomassen, B. (2008). Mimetic errors in liminal schismogenesis: On the political anthropology of the trickster. International Political Anthropology, 1(1), 3-24.
Thomassen, B. (2012). Revisiting liminality: The danger of empty spaces. In H. Andrews & L. Roberts (Eds.), Liminal landscapes: Travel, experience and spaces in-between (pp. 21-35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123164
Thomassen, B. (2014). Liminality and the modern: Living through the in-between. Routledge.
Todorova, M. (1997). Imagining the Balkans. Oxford University Press.
Tolomelli, A. (2015). “Two schools under one roof”. The role of education in the reconciliation process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 10(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/4685
UWC Mostar (2016). Who we are. https://uwcmostar.ba/who-we-are/
Van Gennep, A. (2019). The rites of passage. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226629520.001.0001
Wollentz, G. (2017). Making a home in Mostar: Heritage and the temporalities of belonging. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(10). 928-945 https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1347891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1347891
Wollentz, G. (2019). Conflicted memorials and the need to look forward. The interplay between remembering and forgetting in Mostar and on the Kosovo Field. In M. Sørensen, D. Viejo-Rose, & P. Filippucci (Eds.), Memorials in the aftermath of armed conflict (pp. 159-182). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18091-1_61-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18091-1_6
Woods, L. (1992). Anarchitecture: Architecture is a political act. Academy Press.
Woods, L. (1993). Pamphlet architecture 15: War and architecture (No. 15). Princeton Architectural Press. https://lebbeuswoods.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/war-and-architecture-three-principles/
Woods, L. (2001). Radical reconstruction. Princeton Architectural Press.
Woods, L. (2011). War and architecture: Three principles. Word Press. https://lebbeuswoods.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/war-and-architecture-the-sarajevo-window/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to JECS, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JECS upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide publication rights and the right for JECS to grant permissions as JECS editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and its metadata in professional indexing and reference services. Any revenues from such redistribution are used solely to support the continued publication and distribution of articles.
Accepted 2021-07-06
Published 2021-07-25