Changes in the Understanding of Religious and Cultural Components of Human Capital
Abstract views: 584 / PDF downloads: 380
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/637Keywords:
cultural values, economic development, human capital, religious values.Abstract
This research identified structural differences between the religious and cultural components of human capital in Western and Russian intellectual traditions and created a specific holistic structural conceptual framework based on which further research can be carried out, or decisions can be made about determining human capital for scientific and public policy purposes. Experts selected research texts for examination, and their structural-semantic analysis was used as a research method. A group of 32 authoritative Russian university experts was formed to select the most significant and influential studies of Western scholars on human capital and changes in the attitude towards assessing its religious and cultural components. The selected works were analyzed to determine common concepts for which semantic relationships were established. As a result, a structural diagram of Western research's main ideas concerning the religious and cultural components of human capital was created. Among the totality of basic ideas that define the Western paradigm, there is a generally negative assessment of religiosity as a component of psychology that influences productive forces; a high level of religiosity is rarely correlated with economic prosperity and is not necessarily associated with high levels of morality or health. The novelty of the study is due to the fact that so far no attempts have been made to highlight the most important features of the Western paradigm of understanding the role of a religious or cultural component in the development of human capital and to apply it to determine the differences and possible strategies for the development of the individual economy (in our example, the Russian one). The paper also analyzed the essence of the contradiction between Western and Russian concepts of human capital. This study could serve as a foundation for further developing a strategy for identifying and using human potential to determine public policy for cultural and economic development.Downloads
References
Abdelmajied, F. E., & Safijllin, L. N. (2018). А review of the theory of human capital: Definitions, components, measurement, indicators [Proceedings]. The IV International Scientific and Practical Conference The Economic System of Modern Society: Economics and Management (pp. 6-12). Novosibirsk, February 26-March 27.
Andryukhina, L. M., Dorozhkin, Y., Kislov, A., Senognoeva, N., & Kolobkov, P. (2020). Growth of creative capital and human perspectives under the conditions of globalisation. Space and Culture, India, 7(4), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i4.633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i4.633
Baumard, N., Hyafil, A., Morris, I., & Boyer, P. (2015). Increased affluence explains the emergence of ascetic wisdoms and moralizing religions. Current Biology, 25(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.063
Beck, S. V., & Gundersen, S. J. (2016). A gospel of prosperity? An analysis of the relationship between religion and earned income in Ghana, the most religious country in the world. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(1) 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jssr.12247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12247
Beetham, D. (2018). Max Weber and the theory of modern politics. John Wiley & Sons.
Bennink, H. (2012). Foundations of organizational moral climate theory [Doctoral dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen]. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/95519/95519.pdf
Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Dzhyhar, T. (2017). Human capital factors and remuneration: Analysis of relations, modelling of influence. Business: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 208-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.022
Biniukova, I. S. (2016). The human and human capital in the culture: Moral and legal aspect. International Scientific & Research Magazine, 9(51), 36-37. https://doi.org/10.18454/IRJ.2016.51.106
Crabtree, S. (2010). Religiosity highest in world’s poorest nations. Gallup Global Reports, 31. https://news.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspx
Damian, J., Ruck, D. J., Bentley, R. A., & Lawson, D. J. (2018). Religious change preceded economic change in the 20th century. Science Advances, 4(7), eaar8680. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8680
Gertner, S. L., & Kitov, Y. V. (2017). Human capital as cultural and intellectual issue. Bulletin of Culture & Arts, 2(50), 78-86.
Goldin, C. D. (2016). Human capital. In C. Diebolt & M. Haupert (Eds.), Handbook of cliometrics (pp. 55-86). Springer Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40406-1_23
Hayek, M., Thomas, C. H., Novicevic, M. M., & Montalvo, D. (2016). Contextualizing human capital theory in a non-Western setting: Testing the pay-for-performance assumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 928-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres. 2015.06.039 https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3488587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.039
Korchagin, Y. A. (2012). Human capital and innovative economy in Russia. Centre of Regional Economic Research.
Maira, M. (2019). A content analysis of protestant work ethic. Cuestiones Politicas, 36(65).
Mamedov, F. (2012). Human capital: Opportunities of cultural approach towards analysis and estimation. Cultural Magazine, 1, 1-7.
Marginson, S. (2019). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359823
McCleary, R., & Barro, R. J. (2019). The wealth of religions: The political economy of believing and belonging. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc775c4
Mokyr, J., Sarid, A., & van der Beek, K. (2019). The wheels of change: Human capital, millwrights, and industrialisation in Eighteenth-Century England. Millwrights, and Industrialisation in Eighteenth-Century England. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3488587
Mutiyev, Z., Akbulatov, A., Azhgaliyev, M., Sultangaliyeva, R., & Shagimgereyeva, B. (2018). Modernisation of social Conscience: Topical problems of literary local lore. Space and Culture, India, 6(4), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i4.383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i4.383
Navarro, J., & Skirbekk, V. (2018). Income inequality and religion globally 1970–2050. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 28, 175-199. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.70072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.70072
Nayar, S., & Wright St.Clair, V. (2020). Multiple Cultures – One Process: Undertaking A Cross Cultural Grounded Theory Study. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/9310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/9310
Nemeth, J. (2017). Human capital theory in the framework of organization theory. Strategic Management, 22(3), 29-35. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-3448/2017/1821-34481703029N.pdf
Newman, D. B., & Graham, J. (2018). Religion and well-being. In Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City. DEF Publishers.
Paul, G. (2009). The chronic dependence of popular religiosity upon dysfunctional psychosociological conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 398-441. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F147470490900700305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700305
Pinker, S. (2018). How the Enlightenment gave us peace, prosperity, and progress. Cato Institute Policy Report. https://www.cato.org/policy-report/marchapril-2018/how-enlightenment-gave-us-peace-prosperity-progress
Pivovar, O. A. (2014). Some questions of the human capital formation and the impact of religious mindset component on it. Voronezh Economy, 1, 12-13.
Portilla, J. G. (2019). “Ye Shall Know Them by Their Fruits”: Prosperity and institutional religion in Europe and the Americas. Religions, 10(6), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10060362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10060362
Provonsha, M. (2019). Religious belief and societal health: New study reveals that religion does not lead to a healthier society. Skeptic, 12(3), 26-29. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-3448/2017/1821-34481703029N.pdf
Roser, M. (2013). Economic growth. Religiosity and prosperity. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth#correlates-determinants-and-consequences
Schipkov, A. (2018). “Human capital” – Immoral term. Religion and Media, 4. http://www.pravoslavie.ru/112706.html
Stastna, K. (2013). Do countries lose religion as they gain wealth? CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/do-countries-lose-religion-as-they-gain-wealth-1.1310451
Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(3), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739830140305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739830140305
Watson, J. K. (2016). Asian Tigers: Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea. The Encyclopedia of postcolonial studies (pp. 1-11). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps019
Zimmer, Z., Rojo, F., Ofstedal, M. B., Chiu, C. T., Saito, Y., & Jagger, C. (2019). Religiosity and health: A global comparative study. SSM-Population Health, 7, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.11.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to JECS, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JECS upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide publication rights and the right for JECS to grant permissions as JECS editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and its metadata in professional indexing and reference services. Any revenues from such redistribution are used solely to support the continued publication and distribution of articles.
Accepted 2021-01-15
Published 2021-02-16