Technological and Pedagogical Models: Analysis of Factors and Measurement of Learning Outcomes in Education

Ratnawati Susanto; Reza Rachmadtullah; Widarto Rachbini

doi:10.29333/ejecs/311

Authors

Ratnawati Susanto Universitas Esa Unggul
Reza Rachmadtullah Universitas PGRI Adi Buana, Surabaya http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-8030
Widarto Rachbini Graduate School Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311

Keywords:

Technological, Pedagogical, Learning Outcome.

Abstract

The era of the industrial revolution 4.0 emphasizes the importance of the digital literacy elaboration that links the full technological and pedagogical capabilities to enhance learning outcomes in all three domains that include knowledge, skills and attitudes. Much is needed of factor analysis and measurement studies that touch on aspects of pedagogy and technology as an indicator analysis of pedagogical competency development models. The method used is a quantitative approach, data analysis technique is done through the Goodness of-Fit criteria. The stages of modeling and analysis of structural equations in the analysis of first and second measurement models are performed with CFA and using SEM as a tool. Data analysis was also carried out to analyze indicators that predominantly influenced learning outcomes. The results of the study concluded that the Technological and Pedagogical Model was a factor and measurement of learning achievements in education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamri, A., and Tyler-Wood, T. (2017). Factors Affecting Learners With Disabilities–Instructor Interaction in Online Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681497

Alluhaidan, A., Chatterjee, S., Drew, D., & Stibe, A. (2018). Sustaining Health Behaviors Through Empowerment: A Deductive Theoretical Model of Behavior Change Based on Information and Communication Technology (ICT). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_3

Andrew, M., Taylorson, J., Langille, D. J., Grange, A., & Williams, N. (2018). Student attitudes towards technology and their preferences for learning tools/devices at two universities in the UAE. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 309–344. https://doi.org/10.28945/4111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4111

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers : an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x

Applewhite, S. R., Kao, D., & Pritzker, S. (2018). Educator and practitioner views of professional competencies for macro social work practice. International Social Work, 61(6), 1169–1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817702705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817702705

Asri Humaira, M., Rasmitadila, Widyasari, Rachmadtullah, R., & Kardaya, D. (2019). Using blended learning model (BLM) in the instructional process: teacher student perception’s. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 012213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012213

Barak, M. (2017). Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: a Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y

Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2018). Conceptualising technology practice in education using Bourdieu’s sociology. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462205

Cahyana, U., Sumantri, M. S., & Hasanah, U. (2017, May). Influence model of learning and critical-thinking ability of learning science of primary school students. Proceedings of the 29th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth. Vienna, Austuria

Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The Role of Collaboration, Computer Use, Learning Environments, and Supporting Strategies in CSCL: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework : Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychology, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Computers, J. (2013). Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT. Journal Computers and Education, 68, 380–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.022

Cundill, G., & Rodela, R. (2012). A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 113(September), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.021

Daane, A. R., Haglund, J., Robertson, A. D., Close, H. G., & Scherr, R. E. (2018). The pedagogical value of conceptual metaphor for secondary science teachers. Science Education, 102(5), 1051–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21451

Devine, M., Houssemand, C., & Meyers, R. (2013). Instructional coaching for teachers : A strategy to implement new practices in the classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(1), 1126–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.001

Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158

Hadar, L. L., & Ergas, O. (2019). Cultivating mindfulness through technology in higher education: a Buberian perspective. AI and SOCIETY, 34(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0794-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0794-z

Halpern, C. (2017). Book Review: In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (2nd ed.). American Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(1), 32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5790

He, Y., Lundgren, K., & Pynes, P. (2017). Impact of short-term study abroad program: Inservice teachers’ development of intercultural competence and pedagogical beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.012

Iasha, V., Rachmadtullah, R., Sudrajat, A., & Hartanti, D. (2019). The Impact Interactive Learning Media on The Learning Outcomes of Fifth Grade Social Science Knowledge in Elementary Schools. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282120

Jaleel, S., & Verghis, A. M. (2015). Knowledge Creation in Constructivist Learning. 3(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030102

Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000

Jin, B. (2019). Country-level technological disparities, market feedback, and scientists’ choice of technologies. Research Policy, 48(1), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.007

Karakus, M. (2018). The Moderating Effect of Gender on the Relationships between Age, Ethical Leadership, and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 5(1), 74-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/106

Khanagha, S., Ramezan Zadeh, M. T., Mihalache, O. R., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). Embracing Bewilderment: Responding to Technological Disruption in Heterogeneous Market Environments. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1079–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12348

Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 102, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003

Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712

Liu, S., Tsai, H., & Huang, Y. (2015). Collaborative Professional Development of Mentor Teachers and Pre-Service Teachers in Relation to Technology Integration. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 161–172.

Livingstone, S. (2007). How student teachers develop their understanding of teaching using ICT People also read Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education.

Lucke, T., Dunn, P. K., & Christie, M. (2017). Activating learning in engineering education using ICT and the concept of ‘Flipping the classroom.’ European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1201460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1201460

Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) with Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Integration: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093

McFarlane, A. E. (2019). Devices and desires: Competing visions of a good education in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12764

McKenney, S., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Technology for teacher learning and performance. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1600859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1600859

Mei, J., Lin, C., Wang, P. Y., & Lin, I. C. (2010). Pedagogy - technology : A two ‐ dimensional model for teachers ’ ICT integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 97–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01159.x

Ollila, J., & Macy, M. (2018). Social studies curriculum integration in elementary classrooms: A case study on a Pennsylvania Rural School. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2018.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2018.02.001

Peterson, R. A. (1994). Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : A Meta-analysis of Cronbach ’ s Coefficient Alpha. Oxford Journals, 21(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209405

Piquero, A. R. (Ed.). (2015). The Handbook of Criminological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118512449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118512449

Rachmadtullah, R., Ms, Z., & Sumantri, M. S. (2018). Development of computer - based interactive multimedia : study on learning in elementary education. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(4), 2035–2038. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.16384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.16384

Redecker, C. (2013). Changing Assessment — Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT. (February). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018

Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., … Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01

Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., Bohle Carbonell, K., Townsend, D., Rozendal, A. P., van der Loo, J., Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). Online training of TPACK skills of higher education scholars: A cross-institutional impact study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.801073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.801073

Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

Sergis, S. E. (2014). From Teachers’ to Schools’ ICT Competence Profiles. Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning, (July), 307–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02264-2_19

Sumantri, M. S., Prayuningtyas, A. W., Rachmadtullah, R., & Magdalena, I. (2018). The Roles of Teacher-Training Programs and Student Teachers’ Self-Regulation in Developing Competence in Teaching Science. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7077–7081. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12412

Susanto, R., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2019). Model of pedagogic competence development: Emotional intelligence and instructional communication patterns. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 2358–2361.

Susanto, R., Rozali, Y. A., & Agustina, N. (2019). Development of pedagogical competency models for elementary school teachers: Pedagogical knowledge, reflective ability, emotional intelligence and instructional communication pattern. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2124–2132. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071010

Tamte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Kårstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers and Education, 84(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005

Turgut, G., Tunga, Y., & Kisla, T. (2016). Technology Education in Preschool : An Applied Sample Lesson. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7(1), 81–91.

Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005

Wahyudin, D. (2016). A View on Teaching Philosophy in Curriculum Implementation at the Indonesia University of Education. SOSIOHUMANIKA, 9(2), 235–248.

Wang, F., Li, W., Mayer, R. E., & Liu, H. (2018). Animated pedagogical agents as aids in multimedia learning: Effects on eye-fixations during learning and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000221

Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2019). Buber, educational technology, and the expansion of dialogic space. AI and SOCIETY, 34(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6

Wheelan, S. (2004). The Handbook of Group Research and Practice. New York, NY: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412990165

Widyasari, Rasmitadila, Asri Humaira, M., Rusmiati Aliyyah, R., Abdul Gaffar, A., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2019). Preliminary study on the development of blended learning (BLM) model: based on needs analysis and learning independence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 012207. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012207

Woofter, S. (2019). [Book Review]: Building Equity: Policies and Practices to Empower All Learners. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 136-139. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5815

Yong, S. T., Gates, P., & Chan, A. T.-Y. (2019). Similarities and Differences in Learning of Metacognitive Skills. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010101

Yousafzai, A., Chang, V., Gani, A., & Noor, R. M. (2016). Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.010

Zare, S. (2018). Virtual Coexistence in a Persian Diasporic Weblog Community. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 5(2), 77-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/109