Engagement and Educational Equity: Ukrainian Refugees’ Experiences in the Community College Second Language Writing Classroom

Oksana Vorobel; Heather Finn

doi:10.29333/ejecs/2206

Authors

Oksana Vorobel Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-6150
Heather Finn Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9224-3151

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2206

Keywords:

Educational equity, engagement, refugees, English learners, writing, community college

Abstract

With an overwhelming increase in refugees around the world (UNHCR, 2023) and a growing number of immigrant students in higher education (Batalova & Feldblum, 2023), the need for enhancing refugees’ engagement, and subsequently, ensuring educational equity, becomes even more urgent. In U.S. community colleges, classrooms are a key site of engagement; since students have multiple responsibilities at home and work, they therefore have limited opportunities to engage with their college community outside of class time (Lancaster & Lundberg, 2019). While prior studies have focused broadly on student engagement in the classroom, there remains little research on the engagement of refugee English learners (RELs) in community college classrooms (Leo, 2021). In this qualitative multiple-case study, we explore how refugees engage in our English as a Second Language (ESL) writing classrooms at a large, urban community college and how faculty can better bolster engagement and ensure educational equity. The following three research questions guided our inquiry: (1) How do RELs in second language (L2) community college writing classrooms define engagement? (2) What is RELs’ engagement in L2 community college writing classrooms? (3) How do faculty support RELs’ engagement and ensure educational equity in the writing classroom? Our findings reveal that RELs connect engagement with motivation, community, and participation in class. As multilingual writers, RELs feel most engaged when they are in a supportive classroom community, assignments are relevant to their interests, and they have ample opportunities to interact with classmates. Overall, asset-based pedagogies are most effective in enhancing engagement and educational equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oksana Vorobel, Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York

Dr. Oksana Vorobel is Professor of ESL and Linguistics at Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York. Her research interests include second language literacy, use of technology in language learning and teaching, and distance language education. Her work has been published in journals such as System, Teachers College Record, Writing & Pedagogy, and CALICO Journal.

Heather Finn, Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York

Dr. Heather B. Finn is Professor of ESL and Linguistics at Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York. Her research focuses on language and literacy learning among adult immigrant and refugee students, including how educational policies shape reading and writing instruction and the effects of prior trauma on second language acquisition.

References

Almon, C. (2015). College persistence and engagement in light of a mature English language learner (ELL) student’s voice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2013.850757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2013.850757

Batalova, J. & Feldblum, M. (2023). Investing in the future: Higher ed should give greater focus to growing immigrant-origin student population. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/investing-future-immigrant-origin-students

Bauer, C. A., Boemelburg, R., & Walton, G. M. (2021). Resourceful actors, not weak victims: Reframing refugees’ stigmatized identity enhances long-term academic engagement. Psychological Science, 32(12), 1896–1906. https://doi-org.bmcc.ezproxy.cuny.edu/10.1177/09567976211028978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211028978

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on community college enrollment and student success: Evidence from California administrative data. Education Finance and Policy, 17(4), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00384

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301

Harklau, L. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588096

Hartman, C., Callahan, R., & Yu, H. (2021). Optimizing intent to transfer: Engagement and community college English learners. Research in Higher Education, 62(6), 789–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09619-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09619-3

Hirano, E. (2014). Refugees in first-year college: Academic writing challenges and resources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.001

Hos, R. (2016). Caring is not enough: Teachers’ enactment of ethical care for adolescent students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE) in a newcomer classroom. Education and Urban Society, 48(5), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/001312451453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124514536440

Janesick, V. J. (2011). “Stretching” exercises for qualitative researchers. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136078041101600402

Joyce, A., Earnest, J., de Mori, G., & Silvagni, G. (2010). The experiences of students from refugee backgrounds at universities in Australia: Reflections on the social, emotional and practical challenges. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq001

Kanno, Y. (2018). High-performing English learners’ limited access to four-year college. Teachers College Record, 120(4), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681181200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000405

Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.

Lancaster, J. R., & Lundberg, C. A. (2019). The influence of classroom engagement on community college student learning: A quantitative analysis of effective faculty practices. Community College Review, 47(2), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119835922

Leo, A. (2021). Aspiration and opportunity: First-generation immigrants and refugees at community college. Community College Review, 49(4), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211026680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211026680

Leo, A., Wilcox, K., & Tobin, J. (2022). From the Classroom to the Community: Peer Relationships in an Ecological Context. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(3), 74-98. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12453

Levinson, M., Geron, T., & Brighouse, H. (2022). Conceptions of educational equity. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221121344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221121344

Li, M., Yu, L., Qin, Y., Lu, P., & Zhang, X. (2016). College student academic motivation and engagement in the college English course. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(9), 1767–1773. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0609.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0609.07

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00405849209543534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

National Equity Project. (n.d.). Educational equity definition. https://www.nationalequityproject.org/education-equity-definition

OECD. (2023). Equity and inclusion in education: Finding strength through diversity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9072e21-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/e9072e21-en

Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance. (2023). Population Data for New York State. https://otda.ny.gov/programs/bria/documents/population-report.pdf

Oga-Baldwin, W. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128

Ogilvie, G., & Fuller, D. (2016). Restorative justice pedagogy in the ESL classroom: Creating a caring environment to support refugee students. TESL Canada Journal, 33(10), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i0.1247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i0.1247

O’Shea, S. (2024). Rethinking student belonging, engagement, and success: An equity perspective. JANZSSA: Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 32(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.30688/janzssa.2024-1-03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30688/janzssa.2024-1-03

Ratini, T. (2019). Refugee. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(2), 97-99. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/6432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/6432

Reinders, H., & Nakamura, S. (2022). Engagement. In T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the psychology of language learning and teaching (pp. 137–148). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321498-14

Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–09. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.

UNHCR. (2023). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2023. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2023

van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

Ward, C. (2020). Theories of justice underpinning equity in education for refugee and asylum-seeking youth in the U.S.: considering Rawls, Sandel, and Sen. Ethics and Education, 15(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1774721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1774721

Ward, N., & Batalova, J. (2023). Refugees and asylees in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/refugees-and-asylees-united-states-2022

Wilson, V.E., Le Brocque, R., Drayton, J., & Hammer, S. (2024). Understanding and responsiveness in the trauma-informed adult ESL classroom. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51, 2069–2097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00680-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00680-2

Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2023). The impact of L2 writing instructional approaches on student writing motivation and engagement. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 958–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820957024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820957024

Zetter, R. (2019). Conceptualising forced migration: Praxis, scholarship and empirics. In A. Bloch & G. Dona (Eds.), Forced migration: Current issues and debates (pp. 19-43). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623757-2

Zhou, S. A., & Hiver, P. (2022). The effect of self-regulated writing strategies on students’ L2 writing engagement and disengagement behaviors. System, 106, 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102768

Zhou, J., Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2022). Investigating high schoolers’ L2 writing anxiety, L2 writing self-efficacy, L2 writing self-regulated strategies, and L2 writing engagement: Relationships and mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012407