Public Diplomacy and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey:  A Retrospective Look at Government Investment in Soft Power

Vedat Demir

doi:10.29333/ejecs/2017

Authors

Vedat Demir Freie Universität Berlin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-2915

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2017

Keywords:

puplic diplomacy, soft power, authoritarianism, Turkey, democratic backsliding

Abstract

This paper discusses the development of public diplomacy policies and their implementation by the Turkish government through aggregate investment data and within the broader regional and global context in which the country’s policies evolved. Its main aim is to show how regime type is interrelated with foreign policy in general and public diplomacy as a branch of it. Turkey is a fruitful case because the country has experienced significant democratic backsliding since 2011, unlike the first period when the Justice and Development Party (henceforth AKP) came to power in 2002. The discussion over the data on budgets of various institutions responsible for adopting public diplomacy policies shows that cultural and educational public diplomacy received a major increase in investment, especially within the last six years, whereas the budgets for other institutions have fluctuated over the last ten years. Although the paper’s purpose was to provide a comprehensive picture of Turkey’s public diplomacy throughout the AKP rule since 2002, its main data source remains limited to the last decade. Thus, the availability and transparency of the data and its indication of the relationship between regime qualities and public diplomacy policies are also noted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vedat Demir, Freie Universität Berlin

Vedat Demir is an Einstein Guest Researcher in the Social and Political Department at Freie Universität Berlin. Previously, he served at Universität Potsdam as the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung Philipp Schwartz Initiative fellow until 2021. Prior to that, he worked at Istanbul University as a communication professor until his dismissal by a government decree in 2016. Dr. Demir obtained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Marmara University and his Ph.D. from Istanbul University. He also served as the former general secretary of the Turkish Press Council. His research focuses on political communication and public diplomacy.

References

Adar, S., Aksoy, H. A., Çevik, S., Isachenko, D., Rau, M., & Yaşar, N. T. (2021, August 20). Visualizing Turkey’s foreign policy activism. Center for Applied Turkey Studies. https://www.catsnetwork.eu/topics/visualizing-turkeys-foreign-policy-activism

Altunişik, M. B., & Martin, L. G. (2011). Making sense of Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East under AKP. Turkish Studies, 12(4), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.622513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.622513

Angey, G. (2018). The Gülen movement and the transfer of a political conflict from Turkey to Senegal. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 19(1) 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2018.1453256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2018.1453256

Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index. (2020). BTI 2020 country report:Turkey. https://www.bti-project.org/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2020_TUR.pdf

Bošković, M. M., Reljić, D. & Vračić, A. (2015). Elsewhere in the neighborhood: Reaching out to the western Balkans. In B. S. Çevik & P. Seib (Eds.), Turkey’s public diplomacy (pp. 98–120). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466983_6

Caman, M. E. (2021). Authoritarianization and human rights in Turkey: How the AKP legitimizes human rights violations. In H. Aydin & W. Langley (Eds.), Human rights in Turkey: Assaults on human dignity (pp. 51–88). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57476-5_9

Çevik, B. S. (2020). Turkey's public diplomacy in flux from proactive to reactive communication. In N. Snow & N. J. Cull (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public diplomacy (pp. 350-388). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429465543-41

Çevik, B. S., & Seib, P. (2015). Introduction: Why Turkey's public diplomacy matters. In B. S. Çevik & P. Seib (Eds.), Turkey's public diplomacy (pp. 1–13). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466983_1

Cull, N. J. (2008a). The cold war and the United States information agency. American propaganda and public diplomacy, 1945–1989. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817151

Cull, N. J. (2008b). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 31–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25097993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952

Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Figueroa Press.

d’Hooghe, I. (2005). Public diplomacy in the People’s Republic of China. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations (pp. 88–105). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_5

Daily Sabah. (2021, March 22). Maarif Foundation a global education brand: Chair Birol Akgün. https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/maarif-foundation-a-global-education-brand-chair-birol-akgun

Dalacoura, K. (2017). A new phase in Turkish foreign policy: Expediency and AKP survival. Future notes, 4. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI). https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/menara_fn_4.pdf

Davis, A. (2020, October 1). Do Turkish schools increase Erdogan’s influence abroad? Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/turkish-schools-germany-erdogan-influence/a-51948242

Demir, V. (2015). Historical perspective: Ottomans and the republican era. In B. S. Çevik & P. Seib (Eds.), Turkey’s public diplomacy (pp. 43–67). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466983_3

Demir, V. (2021). Freedom of the media in Turkey under the AKP government. In H. Aydin & W. Langley (Eds.), Human rights in Turkey: Assaults on human dignity (pp. 51–88). Springer. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57476-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57476-5_3

Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. (n.d.). About us. https://en.afad.gov.tr/about-us

El, K. (2023, March 21). AFAD'ın yapısı tartışmaya açıldı [AFAD's structure was opened to discussion]. Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/tr/afadın-yapısı-tartışmaya-açıldı/a-65061859

Freedom House. (2014). Freedom of the press 2014. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FOTP_2014.pdf

Friedrich, C. J., & Brzezinski, Z. K. (1965). Totalitarian dictatorship and autocracy (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. The Macmillan Inc.

Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142

Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the ‘new’ public diplomacy. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations (pp. 28–43). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_2

Karakaş, B. (2019, Oct. 25). TİKA harcamaları artıyor, şeffaflık azalıyor [TIKA expenditures increase, transparency decreases]. Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/tr/ti̇ka-harcamaları-artıyor-şeffaflık-azalıyor/a-50970818

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/20049052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049052

Leonard, M., Stead, C., & Smewing, C. (2002). Public diplomacy. Foreign Policy Center.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002, April). Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13(2), 51–65.

https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026

Lord, C. (2018). Religious politics in Turkey from the birth of the republic to the AKP. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638906

Melissen, J. (2005). The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations (pp. 3–27). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_1

Nye, J. S. (2002). The paradox of American power: Why the world's only superpower can’t go it alone. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195161106.001.0001

Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2023). Net ODA (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/33346549-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/33346549-en

Repnikova, M. (2022). Russia’s war in Ukraine and the fractures in Western soft power. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 19, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00282-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00282-2

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2008). UN Security Council Elections for the Term 2009–2010 [Press release]. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_184---17-october-2008_-press-release-regarding-the-un-security-council-elections-for-the-term-2009-2010.en.mfa

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (n.d.) Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC). https://www.mfa.gov.tr/OIC.en.mfa

Rutland, P., & Kazantsev, A. (2016). The limits of Russia’s “soft power.” Journal of Political Power, 9(3), 395–413. https://doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287

Solaker, G. (2023, Feb. 8). AFAD büyük bir depreme ne kadar hazırdı? [How ready was AFAD for a major earthquake?]. Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/tr/afad-büyük-bir-depreme-ne-kadar-hazırdı/a-64639121

Taş, H. (2020). The chronopolitics of national populism. Global Studies in Culture and Power, 29(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1735160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1735160

Taş, H. (2022). The formulation and implementation of populist foreign policy: Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 27(5), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1833160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1833160

Taskinsoy, J. (2021, August 18). Turkey’s melancholy economic indicators camouflaged by militarization as a foreign policy. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3907590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3907590

Tepeciklioğlu, E. E. (2017). Economic relations between Turkey and Africa: Challenges and prospects, The Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 8(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v8i1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v8i1.2

The Economist. (2016, February 6). Turkey: Erdoğan’s new sultanate [Special report]. http://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/20160206_turkey.pdf

Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating with the world: U.S. public diplomacy overseas. St. Martin's Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-60512-5

Tür, Ö. (2015). Engaging with the Middle East: The rise and fall of Turkish leadership in the 2000s. In B. S. Çevik & P. Seib (Eds.), Turkey's public diplomacy (pp. 67–84). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466983_4

Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency. (n.d.). About us. https://www.tika.gov.tr/en/page/about_us-14650

Türkiye Maarif Vakfı. (n.d.). Turkish Maarif Foundation. https://turkiyemaarif.org/page/about-us

Yunus Emre Institute. (2022). Annual Report. https://www.yee.org.tr/tr/yayin/2022-faaliyet-raporu

Yunus Emre Institute. (n.d.). https://www.yee.org.tr/en/corporate/yunus-emre-institute