Devoid Elites and the Need for a New Elite Configuration: An Analysis of Post-Soviet Societies on the Example of Azerbaijan

Michael Gerlich

doi:10.29333/ejecs/1616

Authors

Michael Gerlich SBS Swiss Business School https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-6406

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1616

Keywords:

Azerbaijan, clientelism, devoid elites, hyperagents, imposed unity elites, loyalty, post-Soviet, power, elite theory

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive study of the Azerbaijani ruling elites. This study aims to describe the post-Soviet Azerbaijani elites, their interaction, and their influence to elaborate a basis for studying the impact on the government and the economy. The study focuses on the definition and origin of the Azerbaijani elites after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the analysis of their interactions, and the definition of behavior and hierarchy. The study relies on Higley and Burton’s (2006) elite configurations framework and Wedel’s (2003) concept of clans. It draws on qualitative analysis and applies analytical autoethnographic approaches to analyze and interpret the information received. The study used data from 113 informal dialogue interviews with those who worked closely with the elite and the elite representatives. These data provided detailed descriptions of their life and behavior in Central Asia and the South Caucasus. The total number of respondents was 1,817 people. Not all elites have equal access to power. Some, called “hyperagents,” control most decisions. Others, whom the author defines as “devoid elites”, have very little or no real power, although they have some privileges that the elites are endowed with in society. The researcher proposes a new elite configuration entitled “imposed unity elites”, which better describes the majority of Azerbaijani elites. This elite configuration implies the existence and behavior of devoid elites. It also describes elites that seem to be united in public but lacks any basic ideology or common goals. The research contributes to the further development of Higley and Burton’s (2006) framework of elite configurations and the theory of the influence of elites. The possible application of the obtained research results will allow scientists to better understand the development characteristics of the elite configuration in the post-Soviet space and their impact on the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Michael Gerlich, SBS Swiss Business School

Michael Gerlich is PhD, currently works as a Senior Lecturer at the Management Department, SBS Swiss Business School, Zurich-Kloten, Switzerland. Research interests: Azerbaijan, post-Soviet, elite theory.

References

Abramova, M., & Vilisov, M. (2020). The post-soviet transition: Constitutional structuring and political reality (CIS countries case-study). Cuestiones Constitucionales, 42, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2020.42.14335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2020.42.14335

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j

Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2022). World top incomes database. Cessda. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-851805

Antonyan, Y. (2023). Power, family and business: Practices of oligarchic economy in late soviet and post-soviet Armenia (before 2018). In T. Koellner (Ed.), Family firms and business families in cross-cultural perspective: Bringing anthropology back in (pp. 83–113). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20525-5_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20525-5_4

Azerbaijan Statistical Information Service.(2022). The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. https://www.azstat.org/portal/tblInfo/TblInfoList.do;JSESSIONID=FE47579408B6115A84FE8C96031DAEC3#994_002

Bagirov, S. (2021). Political and historical features of the formation of the elite in Azerbaijan. Transylvanian Review, 29(3), Article 1. http://www.transylvanianreviewjournal.com/index.php/TR/article/view/669/pdf_25

Balan, A. (2020). European integration as a historical desideratum of the elites in the Central and Eastern European states. L’europe Unie / United Europe (France), 16, 50–59. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=923885

Bernstein, P. W., & Swan, A. (2007). All the money in the world: How the Forbes 400 make—and spend—their fortunes. Knopf.

Best, H., & Higley, J. (2018). The Palgrave handbook of political elites. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7

Bhattacharyya, S. (2020). A history of global capitalism: Feuding elites and imperial expansion. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58736-9

Boswell, J., Corbett, J., Dommett, K., Jennings, W., Flinders, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wood, M. (2019). State of the field: What can political ethnography tell us about anti‐politics and democratic disaffection? European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12270

Broers, L., & Mahmudlu, C. (2023). Civic dominion: Nation-building in post-soviet Azerbaijan over 25 years of independence. Nationalities Papers, 51(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.92

Burton, M., & Higley, J. (2001). The study of political elite transformations. International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 11(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/713674040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713674040

Casas, T., & Cozzi, G. (2022). Elite Quality Report 2022: Country scores and global rankings (28 April 2022). Seismo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3845376

Chancer, L. S. (2019). Elite ethnography. In C. M. Abramson & N. Gong (Eds.), Beyond the case: The logics and practices of comparative ethnography (pp. 238–-262). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190608484.003.0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190608484.003.0010

Cianetti, L., Dawson, J., & Hanley, S. (2020). Rethinking 'democratic backsliding' in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264795

Collins, K. (2006). Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510014

Colton, T., & Tucker, R. C. (2019). Patterns in post-Soviet leadership. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429301162

Cousin, B., Khan, S., & Mears, A. (2018). Theoretical and methodological pathways for research on elites. Socio-Economic Review, 16(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy019

Daloz, J.-P. (2010). The sociology of elite distinction: From theoretical to perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246836

Dewan, M. (2018). Understanding ethnography: An ‘exotic’ ethnographer’s perspective. In P. Mura & C. Khoo-Lattimore (Eds.), Asian qualitative research in tourism: Perspectives on Asian tourism (pp. 185–203). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_10

DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x

Dogan, M. (2003). Introduction: Diversity of elite configurations and clusters of power. In M. Dogan (Ed.), Elite configurations at the apex of power (pp. 1–15). Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047401742_002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047401742_002

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294

Ergun, A. (2010). Post-Soviet political transformation in Azerbaijan: Political elite, civil society and the trials of democratisation. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 7(26), 67–85. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uidergisi/issue/39273/462483

Ergun, A., & Sayfutdinova, L. (2021). Informal practices in the making of professionals: The case of engineers in Soviet and Post-Soviet Azerbaijan. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020947581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020947581

Friedman, S., & Reeves, A. (2020). From aristocratic to ordinary: Shifting modes of elite distinction. American Sociological Review, 85(2), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420912941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420912941

Gallo, E. (2021). Globalisation, authoritarianism and the post-Soviet state in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1761297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1761297

Gerlich, M. (2021). How elite configurations explain shifts from democracy to authoritarian or totalitarian regimes: Turkey as a case study. Open Journal of Political Science, 11, 273–300. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2021.112019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2021.112019

Gherghina, S., & Volintiru, C. (2021). Political parties and clientelism in transition countries: Evidence from Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Acta Politica, 56(4), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00151-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00151-x

Gilleard, C. (2020). Bourdieu's forms of capital and the stratification of later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 53, Article 100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100851

Glasius, M. (2018). What authoritarianism is… and is not: a practice perspective. International Affairs, 94(3), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy060

Gulbrandsen, T. (2019). Theoretical perspectives on elites. In T. Gulbrandsen (Ed.), Elites in an egalitarian society (pp. 21–51). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95984-9_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95984-9_2

Guliyev, F. (2020). Formal-informal relations in Azerbaijan. Caucasus Analytical Digest. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000400500

Harrington, B. (2017). Habitus and the labor of representation among elite professionals. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(3), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox002

Hartmann, M. (2007). The sociology of elites. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966242

Hénin, P. Y., & Insel, A. (2021). Hungary's U-turn in Kornai's system paradigm perspective: A case for national authoritarian capitalism. Public Choice, 187(1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00882-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00882-1

Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2021). Elites in transnational policy networks. Global Networks, 21(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12301

Herzog, L., & Zacka, B. (2019). Fieldwork in political theory: Five arguments for an ethnographic sensibility. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000703

Higley, J. (2010a). Elite theory and elites. In K. T. Leicht & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics: Handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 161–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_9

Higley, J. (2010b). Epilogue: Democratic elitism and western political thought. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), Democratic Elitism (pp. 210–225). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004179394.i-230.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004179394.i-230.84

Higley, J. (2018a). Continuities and discontinuities in elite theory. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 25–39). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_4

Higley, J. (2018b). Political elites in the west. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 315–328). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_21

Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Higley, J., & Pakulski, J. (1995). Elite transformation in central and eastern Europe. Australian Journal of Political Science, 30(3), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00323269508402348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00323269508402348

Hille, C. (2020). Clans. In C. Hille (Ed.), Clans and democratization: Chechnya, Albania, Afghanistan and Iraq (pp. 13–41). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415485_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415485_003

Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2018). Theory-based typologies of political elites. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 53–68). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_6

Horak, S., & Bader, V. (2023). Persistence and strengths of informal networks–clientelism in the post-Soviet Union. European Journal of International Management, 19(2), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2020.10021180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2023.128428

Ibrahimova, G., & Moog, P. (2023). Colonialism versus independence: The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Azerbaijan over time. Small Business Economics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00725-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00725-3

Jones, B. (2021). Elites in the United Kingdom. In B. Jones & P. Norton, I. Hertner (Eds.), Politics UK (10th ed., pp. 180-–193). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003028574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003028574-13

Junisbai, B., & Junisbai, A. (2019). Regime type versus patronal politics: a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2019.1568144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2019.1568144

Kailitz, S., & Stockemer, D. (2017). Regime legitimation, elite cohesion and the durability of autocratic regime types. International Political Science Review, 38(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115616830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115616830

Kapidžić, D. (2021). The rise of illiberal politics in Southeast Europe. In D. Kapidžić & V. Stojarová (Eds.), Illiberal politics in Southeast Europe (pp. 1–17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003208327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003208327-1

Karaoğuz, H. E. (2022). The developmental state in the 21st century: A critical analysis and a suggested way forward. Panoeconomicus, 69(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN180918005K DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN180918005K

Karpa, M. I., Akimova, L. M., Akimov, O. O., Serohina, N., Oleshko, O., & Lipovska, N. (2021). Public administration as a systemic phenomenon in society. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11, 56–62. https://ir.nmu.org.ua/handle/123456789/163055

Lindenfors, P., Wilson, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). The Matthew effect in political science: head start and key reforms important for democratisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00596-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00596-7

Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, Article 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632

Longo, M., & Zacka, B. (2019). Political theory in an ethnographic key. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 1066–1070. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000431

Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Kling, G. (2014). Pathways to power: Class, hyper-agency and the French corporate elite. Organisation Studies, 35(6), 825–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613509919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613509919

Marques, D. F. (2021). Political phenomenology as ethnographic method. In J. Melançon (Ed.), Transforming politics with Merleau-Ponty: Thinking beyond the state (pp. 145–163). Rowman & Littlefield.

McDonald, D. (2022). Popular protests and democratization in post-Soviet countries: An analysis of why some democracy movements failed and others succeeded [Undergraduate Thesis, University of Mississippi]. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/2469/

Melville, A., & Mironyuk, M. (2015). “Bad enough governance”: state capacity and quality of institutions in post-Soviet autocracies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2015.1052215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1052215

Niftiyev, I. (2022). Principal component and regression analysis of the natural resource curse doctrine in the Azerbaijani economy. Journal of Life Economics, 9(4), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.9.4.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.9.4.02

Nisnevich, Y., & Ryabov, A. (2020). Post-Soviet authoritarianism. Russian Social Science Review, 61(6), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2020.1852042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2020.1852042

O’Brochta, W. (2023). Elite responses to ethnic diversity and interethnic contact. Political Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09859-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09859-w

Pleines, H. (2019). The political role of business magnates in competitive authoritarian regimes. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte/Economic History Yearbook, 60(2), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbwg-2019-3001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbwg-2019-3001

Plows, A. (2008). Social movements and ethnographic methodologies: An analysis using case study examples. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1523–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00091.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00091.x

Pogodda, S., & Richmond, O. P. (2015). Palestinian unity and everyday state formation: Subaltern ‘ungovernmentality’ versus elite interests. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 890–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029909

Raleigh, C., & Wigmore-Shepherd, D. (2022). Elite coalitions and power balance across African regimes: introducing the African cabinet and political elite data project (ACPED). Ethnopolitics, 21(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2020.1771840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2020.1771840

Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ, 337, Article a1020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1020

Robinson, W. I. (2012). Global capitalism theory and the emergence of transnational elites. In A. Kakabadse & N. Kakabadse (Eds.), Global elites: The opaque nature of transnational policy determination (pp. 54–73). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_3

Ruostetsaari, I. (2021). Fragmentation of the inner circle of power: Circulation between the Finnish elites in 1991–2021. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(1), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12220

Rutland, P. (2023). Thirty years of nation-building in the Post-Soviet states. Nationalities Papers, 51(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.94

Salverda, T., & Abbink, J. (2013). Introduction: An anthropological perspective on elite power and the cultural politics of elites. In J. Abbink & T. Salverda (Eds.), The anthropology of elites: Power, culture, and the complexities of distinction (pp. 1–28). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290557_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290557_1

Samadov, B. (2019). Authoritarianism and social mobilization in Azerbaijan: Subjectivities, logics, fantasies [Master’s thesis, Central European University]. https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2019/samadov_bahruz.pdf

Sanghera, B., & Satybaldieva, E. (2020). The other road to serfdom: The rise of the rentier class in post-Soviet economies. Social Science Information, 59(3), 505–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018420943077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018420943077

Smirnova, E., Kot, S., Kolpak, E., & Shestak, V. (2021). Governmental support and renewable energy production: A cross-country review. Energy, 230, Article 120903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120903

Smit, D. (2019). Power and class in political fiction: Elite theory and the post-war Washington novel. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26769-8

Steen, A. (2019). Between past and future: elites, democracy and the state in post-communist countries: a comparison of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429242700

Suny, R. G. (2019). Elite transformation in late-soviet and post-soviet Transcaucasia, or what happens when the ruling class can't rule? In T. Colton & R. C Tucker (Eds.), Patterns in post-Soviet leadership (pp. 141–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429301162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429301162-8

Szanyi, M. (2022). The emergence of patronage and changing forms of rent seeking in East Central Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 34(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1693738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1693738

Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2017). Introducing elite discourse: The rhetorics of status, privilege, and power. Social Semiotics, 27(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1301789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1301789

Varshney, A. (2021). Populism and nationalism: An overview of similarities and differences. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09332-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09332-x

Visser, O., Dorondel, S., Jehlička, P., & Spoor, M. (2019). Post-socialist smallholders: Silence, resistance and alternatives. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 40(4), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2019.1688649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2019.1688649

Wacquant, L. (2019). Bourdieu’s dyad: On the primacy of social space and symbolic power. In J. Blasius, F. Lebaron, B. Le Roux, & A. Schmitz (Eds.), Empirical investigations of social space (pp. 15–21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15387-8_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15387-8_2

Wedel, J. R. (2003). Clans, cliques and captured states: Rethinking ‘transition’ in central and eastern Europe in the former Soviet Union. Journal of International Development, 15, 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.994

Wedel, J. R. (2017). From power elites to influence elites: Resetting elite studies for the 21st century. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5-6), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417715311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417715311

Wedel, J. R. (2021). Shadow elite: How the world’s new power brokers undermine democracy, government, and the free market. In A. Bågenholm, M. Bauhr, M. Grimes, & B. Rothstein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the quality of government (63–C4.P221). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198858218.013.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198858218.013.5

World Values Survey Association (2018). WVSW 7: 2017-2022. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp

Zimmerman, C. C. (2014). Family and civilisation. Open Road Media.