Gendered Social-interactional Contexts in Educational Institutions in Iraq
Abstract views: 262 / PDF downloads: 269
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1541Keywords:
academic institutions, Gender, masculine and feminine, social variablesAbstract
Social variables have a tremendous impact on the language spoken by the male and female genders, particularly in Eastern cultures. Because men and women in Arabic cultures are typically raised separately, they speak somewhat differently depending on their gender. Arabic is used exclusively in educational institutions in the Arab world. The objective of the present study was to examine certain social and linguistic aspects of the language spoken by females and males in mixed academic organisations from the point of view of female academics. It also examined some noted gender differences in previous gender studies of the interactional styles of the two genders in higher education institutions in Iraq from the perspective of female academics, as well as the results of Holmes and Stubbe’s (2003) work. Seventy female lecturers from a variety of disciplines at the University of Baghdad participated in the present research. The data analysis was quantitative in nature. The findings are discussed following a statistical analysis of the collected data using SPSS software. The researchers have reached a number of conclusions, including that female academics should be extremely careful in their choice of vocabulary when speaking to male colleagues because their vocabulary indicates their social status, which was rated as being very high. The female academics were found to use more polite words and compound sentences than did the male academics with regard to the topics of discussion and institutional interactions; none of the female academics disagreed with this point.
Downloads
References
Abd-el-Jawad, H. (1989). Language and women’s place with special reference to Arabic. Language Sciences, 11(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(89)90021-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(89)90021-1
Abu-Haidar, F. (1991). Language and sex: The case of expatriate Iraqis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Semitic studies in honor of Wolf Leslau on the occasion of his eighty-fifth birthday (pp. 409–425). Harrassowitz.
Al-Ali, N. (Spring 2013). The challenges for women working at Iraqi universities: Middle East (Report 266). Middle East Research and Information Project. https://merip.org/2013/03/the-challenges-for-women-working-at-iraqi-universities/
Al-Harahsheh, M. M. (2014). Language and gender differences in Jordanian spoken Arabic: A sociolinguistics perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.5.872-882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.5.872-882
Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. Oxford University Press.
Bassiouney, R. (2010). Identity and code-choice in the speech of educated women and men in Egypt: Evidence from talk shows. In R. Bassiouney (Ed.), Arabic and the media, (pp. 97–123). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004182585.i-303.50
Benmamoun, E. (1996). Agreement asymmetries and the PF interface. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.202.02ben DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.202.02ben
Cameron, D. (1998). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender: A rReader (pp. 270–284). Blackwell Publishers.
Case, S. (1985). A socio-linguistic analysis of the language of gender relations, deviance and influence in managerial groups [Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York]. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/sociolinguistic-analysis-language-gender/docview/303442344/se-2
Case, S. (1988). Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women’s language. In S. Rose & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women’s careers (pp. 41–63). Praeger.
Coates, J. (1996). Women talk. Blackwell.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer.
Cox, A., Read, A., & Van, M. (1990). Male-female differences in communicating job related humor:An exploratory study. Humor, 3(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1990.3.3.287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1990.3.3.287
Dendane, Z. (1998). Aspects of women’s speech in Tlemcen. Cahiers de Linguistique et Didactique, 1, 25–32.
Drakich, J., & James, D. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction, (pp. 281–312). Oxford University Press.
Edelsky, C. (1981). Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10(3), 383–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000885X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000885X
El-Saadawi, N. (1980). The hidden face of Eve: Women in the Arab world (Trans. Sheriff Hatta). Zed Books.
Fisher, S. (1993). Gender, power, resistance: Is care the remedy? In S. Fisher & K. Davis (Eds.), Negotiating at the Margi1l3: The gendered discourse of power and resistance (pp. 87–121). Rutgers University Press.
Hachimi, A. (2007). Gender. In K. Versteegh et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics (vol. 2, pp. 155–164).
Haeri, N. (1996). The sociolinguistic market of Cairo: Gender, class and education. Kegan Paul International.
Harrell, S. (2004). A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Georgetown University Press.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. Longman.
Holmes, J. (2000). Victoria University of Wellington’s language in the workplace project: An overview. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, 1. http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals /wlp /resources /opl.htm
Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Longman.
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. Longman.
Holmes, J., Vine, B., & Marra, M. (2020). Contesting the culture order: Contrastive pragmatics in action. Journal of Contrastive Pragmatics, 7(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-12340002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-12340002
Johnson, C. (1993). Gender and formal authority. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786778
Kebede, G. (2017). Gender diversity in management positions and organizational performance: A review of literature. Management Studies and Economic Systems, 3(4), 245–252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0046764
Lakoff, R.T. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper and Row.
Lakoff, R.T. (1990). Why can’t a woman be less like a man? In Talking power: The politics of language. Basic Books.
Lakoff, R.T. (2004). Language and women’s place: Text and commentaries. Oxford University Press.
McDowell, J. (2018). Men’s talk in women’s work: Doing being a nurse. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language in the workplace (pp. 361–372). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690001-30
Mernissi, F. (1994). The harem within. Bantam Books.
Mohammed, N., & Abbas, N. (2016). Impoliteness in literary discourse: A pragmatic study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.2p.76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.2p.76
Muslah, A. (2019) Language usages by Arabic woman in the Arabic society. International Journal of ELT, Linguistics and Comparative Literature, 7(2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.33329/elt.7219.9
Nelson, W. (1998). Women’s ways: Interactive patterns in predominantly female research team. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 354–372). Blackwell.
Riger, S., & Galligan, P. (1980). Women in Management: An exploration of competing paradigms. American Psychologist, 35(10), 902–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.902
Sadiqi, F. (2003). Women, gender and language in Morocco. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404378
Sadiqi, F. (2007). Arabic in gender. In Brill Encyclopedia of linguistics. Brill.
Sadiqi, F., & Ennaji, M. (2006). The feminization of public space: Women’s activism, the family law, and social change in Morocco. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 2, 86–114. https://doi.org/10.2979/mew.2006.2.2.86 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/MEW.2006.2.2.86
Stroi, O. (2019). Gender-biased language of the workplace. Discourse, 5(6), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-6-120-131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-6-120-131
Stubbe, M. (1998). Striking a balance: Language, gender and professional identity. In S. Wertheim, C. Bailee, & M. Corston-Oliver (Eds.), Engender communication: Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 545–556). Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (1997). Gender and discourse. SAGE Publications.
Tannen, D. (Ed.) (1993). Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford University Press.
Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (Eds.) (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Newbury House.
Tracy, K., & Eisenberg, E. (1990) Giving criticism: A multiple goals: A case study. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389332
Vicente, A. (2009). Gender and language boundaries in the Arab world. Current issues and perspectives. Estudios De Dialectology Norteafricana Y Andalusí, 13, 7–30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to JECS, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JECS upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide publication rights and the right for JECS to grant permissions as JECS editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and its metadata in professional indexing and reference services. Any revenues from such redistribution are used solely to support the continued publication and distribution of articles.
Accepted 2023-04-28
Published 2023-05-07