Latinx’s Attention to Social Context: A Comparison with European Americans and East Asians Living in the U.S.

Merrisa Lin; Nairán Ramírez-Esparza; Diego Pascual y Cabo

doi:10.29333/ejecs/1446

Authors

Merrisa Lin University of Connecticut https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-778X
Dr. Nairán Ramírez-Esparza University of Connecticut https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-5640
Dr. Diego Pascual y Cabo University of Florida

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1446

Keywords:

attribution styles, attention to social context, culture, cultural differences, Latinx

Abstract

Prior research shows that collectivistic East Asians are more sensitive to contextual information than individualistic Americans. However, limited studies have explored other collectivistic societies, such as the Latinx. Extending the current literature, we investigated attention to social context among Latinx living in the United States. Two tasks were used to test how Latinx (N=260) incorporate social context information when making attributions as compared to European Americans (N=220) and East Asians (N=144) living in the United States. In Task 1, participants made attributions about their friend’s career choice. In Task 2, participants made attributions about a character experiencing constraints in a semi-real-life situation. The findings demonstrated that when making attributions, East Asians were more attentive to social context than European Americans. Furthermore, Latinx were attentive to social context like the East Asians, but findings were not consistent across tasks. Results are discussed as a function of cultural frameworks, specifically from the perspectives of European American and East Asian cultures, and from the Latinx cultures. The role of collectivism on holistic thinking and practical implications of culture-driven attention style are discussed. Directions for future research are also suggested.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Merrisa Lin, University of Connecticut

Merrisa Lin is a PhD student in the Department of Psychological Sciences at the University of Connecticut. Her research interests focus on culture, language, and the psychological processes as well as identities of people with diverse backgrounds.

Dr. Nairán Ramírez-Esparza, University of Connecticut

Nairán Ramírez-Esparza is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences at the University of Connecticut.

Dr. Diego Pascual y Cabo, University of Florida

Diego Pascual y Cabo is an Associate Professor in the Department of Spanish & Portuguese Studies at the University of Florida.

References

Brannon, T. N., Jones Taylor, V., & Markus, H. R. (2015). “Two souls, two thoughts,” Two self-schemas: double consciousness can have positive academic consequences for African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 108, 586–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038992

Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007). Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133

Campos, B., & Kim, H. S. (2017). Incorporating the cultural diversity of family and close relationships into the study of health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000122

Campos, B., Ullman, J. B., Aguilera, A., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2014). Familism and psychological health: the intervening role of closeness and social support. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034094

Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298249003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298249003

D'Angiulli, A., Herdman, A., Stapells, D., & Hertzman, C. (2008). Children's event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status. Neuropsychology, 22(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.3.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.3.293

de Oliveira, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2017). Beyond east and west: Cognitive style in Latin America. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(10), 1554-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730816

Fernandez, D. R., Carlson, D. S., Stepina, L. P., & Nicholson, J. D. (1997). Hofstede's country classification 25 years later. The Journal of social psychology, 137(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595412

Hashimoto, T., Mojaverian, T., & Kim, H. S. (2012). Culture, interpersonal stress, and psychological distress. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 527-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112438396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112438396

Hirschman, C. (1983). America’s Melting Pot Reconsidered. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 397–423. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002145

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Holloway, R. A., Waldrip, A. M., & Ickes, W. (2009). Evidence that a simpático self-schema accounts for differences in the self-concepts and social behavior of Latinos versus Whites (and Blacks). Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(5), 1012-1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013883

Ikizer, E. G., & Ramírez-Esparza, N. (2018). Bilinguals’ social flexibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000414

Ikizer, E. G., Ramírez-Esparza, N., & Boyd, R. (2019). #sendeanlat (You tell it too): Text analysis of tweets about sexual harassment experiences of women in Turkey. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0358-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0358-5

Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of experimental social psychology, 3(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0

Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures: A Cultural Look at New Look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02432

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–1267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245

Krull, D. S., Loy, M. H.-M., Lin, J., Wang, C.-F., Chen, S., & Zhao, X. (1999). The Fundamental Fundamental Attribution Error: Correspondence Bias in Individualist and Collectivist Cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1208–1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258003

Krys, K., Vignoles, V. L., de Almeida, I., & Uchida, Y. (2022). Outside the “Cultural Binary”: Understanding Why Latin American Collectivist Societies Foster Independent Selves. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632

Lechuga, J., Santos, B. M., Garza-Caballero, A. A., & Villarreal, R. (2011). Holistic reasoning on the other side of the world: Validation of the Analysis-Holism Scale in Mexicans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(3), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023881

Luegenbiehl, K., Sakamoto, K., Goto, T., Shimomura, Y., Okumura, M., Takayama, A., & Mochizuki, Y. (Producers), & Rarecho (Director). (2016). Aggretsuko [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.netflix.com.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 568-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205013

Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S. (1991). Cultural Variation in the Self-Concept. In: Strauss, J., Goethals, G.R. (eds) The Self: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8264-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8264-5_2

Masuda, T., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Perceiver-induced constraint and attitude attribution in Japan and the US: A case for the cultural dependence of the correspondence bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.004

Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1260-1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555

Miyamoto, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2002). Cultural variation in correspondence bias: The critical role of attitude diagnosticity of socially constrained behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1239

Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949

Nisbett, R. E., Caputo, C., Legant, P., & Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034779

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

Norenzayan, A., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and Causal Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00077

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3

Ramírez-Esparza, N., García-Sierra, A., Rodríguez-Arauz, G., Ikizer, E. G., & Fernández-Gómez, M. J. (2019). No laughing matter: Latinas’ high quality of conversations relate to behavioral laughter. PloS one, 14(4), e0214117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214117

Ramírez-Esparza, N., Gosling, S. D., Benet-Martínez, V., Potter, J. P., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Do bilinguals have two personalities? A special case of cultural frame switching. Journal of research in personality, 40(2), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.001

Reilly, E. B., Stallworthy, I. C., Mliner, S. B., Troy, M. F., Elison, J. T., & Gunnar, M. R. (2021). Infants’ abilities to respond to cues for joint attention vary by family socioeconomic status. Infancy, 26(2), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12380

Rodríguez-Arauz, G., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Boyd, R. & Perez-Brena, N. (2017). Hablo Inglés y Español: Cultural schemas as a function of language. Frontiers in Psychology, Social Psychology 8, 885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00885

Rodríguez-Arauz, G., Ramírez-Esparza, N., García-Sierra, A., Ikizer, E. G., & Fernández-Gómez, M. J. (2019). You go before me, please: Behavioral politeness and interdependent self as markers of Simpatía in Latinas. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(3), 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000232

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10, 173-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3

Senft, N., Campos, B., Shiota, M. N., & Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E. (2021). Who emphasizes positivity? An exploration of emotion values in people of Latino, Asian, and European heritage living in the United States. Emotion, 21(4), 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000737

Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP). (n.d.). Research on Hispanic/latinx populations – a growing need and the current obstacles. https://spsp.org/research-hispaniclatinx-populations-growing-need-and-current-obstacles

Steidel, A. G. L., & Contreras, J. M. (2003). A new familism scale for use with Latino populations. Hispanic journal of behavioral sciences, 25(3), 312-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303256912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303256912

Tukachinsky, R. (2020). Playing a Bad Character but Endorsing a Good Cause: Actor-character Fundamental Attribution Error and Persuasion. Communication Reports, 33(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1691618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1691618

United States Census Bureau. (2022a). Ancestry. United States Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/ancestry.html

United States Census Bureau. (2022b). Hispanic Origin. United States Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/hispanic-origin.html

United States Census Bureau. (2022c). Race. United States Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race.html

Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: The Social Orientation Hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301

Wray, A. H., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E., Isbell, E., Bell, T., & Neville, H. (2017). Development of selective attention in preschool-age children from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 26, 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.06.006