Perceptions & Experiences of Non-Muslim Minority Students on the Muslim Image
Abstract views: 665 / PDF downloads: 686
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/107Keywords:
Muslim image, minority-minority perspective, American non-Muslim minority students, horizontal hostilityAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explore non-Muslim minority students attending a minority-serving university in a rural community on their knowledge and experiences of the Muslim image. Research is dominated by majority-minority interactions and perspectives regarding subjective reports of controversial issues, especially the heightened awareness of Muslim image in the United States over the past two decades. This trend has perpetuated a growing gap in knowledge of understanding the unique minority-minority perceptions and the development of minority cultural awareness; therein, generating the motivation for this study. The researchers applied a qualitative assessment exploring non-Muslim understanding of foundational components associated with the Muslim image, such as basic Islamic vocabulary competencies and additional open-ended questions regarding experienced social interactions. From the responses of the participants stemmed five emerging themes: enculturation, geographic association, stigmatization, influencers, and empathy. These results demonstrate a general openness toward the Muslim identity but also include consistent misconceptions that may be easily rectified by interactive-educational interventions. The findings acknowledge the propensity of non-Muslim minority students’ willingness to learn from authentic Muslim image, despite the influence of disingenuous Muslim images depicted by current media outlets.Downloads
References
Ahmed, M. (2016). Ethnicity, identity and group vitality: A study of Burushos of Srinagar. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/51
Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Altwaiji, M. (2014). Neo-orientalism and the neo-imperialism thesis: Post-9/11 US and Arab world relationship. Arab Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 313-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/arabstudquar.36.4.0313
Barlow, F. K., Hornsey, M. J., Thai, M., Sengupta, N. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). The Wallpaper Effect: The Contact Hypothesis Fails for Minority Group Members Who Live in Areas with a High Proportion of Majority Group Members. Plos ONE, 8(12), 1-8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082228
Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2010). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 191-196, doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_5
Branscombe, N. R., & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The Target’s Perspective (pp. 243-266). New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012679130-3/50046-6
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, (pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359- 378. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Gaston, A., Martinez, J., & Martin, E. P. (2016). Embedding literacy strategies in social studies for eighth-grade students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 7(1), 73-95. doi:10.17499/jsser.16693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.16693
Goldberg, D. M., & Rosenfeld, M. (2014). People-Centric Skills. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hjerm, M. (2001). Education, xenophobia, and nationalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(1), 37-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830124482
Khosravi, J., Aghapouri, H., & Hamehmorad, L. (2016). The Islamist Maktab-Quran in Iran and Its Challenges for Kurdish Nationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/52
Macionis, J. J, & Gerber, L. M. (2011). Sociology. Toronto, Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Mähönen, T. A., Ihalainen, K., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2013). Specifying the contact hypothesis in a minority-minority context: A social identity perspective. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 221(4), 223-231. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000152
Merriam S., & Associates (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Morgan, W. (2015). Boko Haram in Nigeria: President Goodluck Jonathan rejects help from UN Forces to fight insurgency. International Business Times. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com/boko-haram-nigeria-president-goodluck-jonathan-rejects-help-un-forces-fight-1885770
Pappas, S. (2012). Negative portrayals of Muslims get more media attention. Live Science, Retrieved from https://www.livescience.com/25110-negative-messages-muslims-media.html
Putra, I. E. (2014). The role of ingroup and outgroup metaprejudice in predicting prejudice and identity undermining. Peace And Conflict: Journal Of Peace Psychology, 20(4), 574-579. doi:10.1037/pac0000068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000068
Raba', A., & Harzallah, H. (2018). Palestinian Teachers’ Views on the Factors That Limit Students’ Creativity and Some Possible Strategies to Overcome Them. Research In Social Sciences And Technology, 3(2), 40-57. Retrieved from http://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.03.02.3
Reicher, S. (2012). From perception to mobilization: The shifting paradigm of prejudice. In J.Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change, (pp. 27–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022736.003
Rutland, A., Killen, M., & Abrams, D. (2010). A New Social-Cognitive Developmental Perspective on Prejudice: The Interplay Between Morality and Group Identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279-291. doi:10.1177/1745691610369468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369468
Said, E. W. (2000). Invention, memory, and place. Critical Inquiry, 26, 175-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448963
Saroglou, V., Yzerbyt, V., & Kaschten, C. (2011). Meta-stereotypes of groups with opposite religious views: Believers and non-believers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 484–498. doi:10.1002/casp.1123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1123
Schiefer, D., Möllering, A., Daniel, E., Benish-Weisman, M., & Boehnke, K. (2010). Cultural values and outgroup negativity: A cross‐cultural analysis of early and late adolescents. European Journal of Social Psychology. 40(4) 635-651. doi:40. 635 - 651. 10.1002/ejsp.745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.745
Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L.L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective, (pp. 37-60). New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012679130-3/50037-5
Tarman, B. (2017). Editorial: The Future of Social Sciences. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 2(2). Retrieved from http://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.02.02.ed
Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Cairns, E., & Christ, O. (2006). Cross-community contact, perceived status differences, and Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The mediating roles of individual-level versus group-level threat and the moderating role of social identify. Political Psychology, 28(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x
Tausch, N., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., & Cairnes, E. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541-556. doi:10.1348/014466606X155150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X155150
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory, Contemporary Sociology, 94(6). doi:10.2307/2073157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2073157
Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A. J., Main, K. J., & Roy, S. A. (2000). Meta-stereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690–707. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690
Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
Yigit, M. (2018). Does higher education change value perceptions?. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 1(1), 1-8. Retrieved from http://cultureandvalues.org/index.php/JCV/article/view/5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.01.01.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to JECS, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JECS upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide publication rights and the right for JECS to grant permissions as JECS editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and its metadata in professional indexing and reference services. Any revenues from such redistribution are used solely to support the continued publication and distribution of articles.
Accepted 2018-09-09
Published 2018-12-09